Patient undergoing surgery Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 8000 words

Patient undergoing surgery - Dissertation Exampleies from Turkey (Sahin, et.al., 2010, Egri, et.al., 2008), four from the UK (Ashraff, et.al., 2006 Kay and Siriwardena Yeoman, et.al., 2006 Akkad, et.al., 2006, Habiba, et.al., 2004, Vohra, et.al., 2003 Mauffrey, et.al., 2008), collar from Saudi (Khedhiri, et.al., 2013, Abalfotouh, and Adlan, 2012 Amir, et.al., 2012 Al-Faleh, et.al., 2010), whizz from Israel (Brezis, et.al., 2008) one from Switzerland (Ghulam et.al., 2006) one from the Czech Republic (Kopacova and Bures, 2012) and one from Canada (Falagas, et.al., 2006). Majority of the focus of these studies relates to how informed consent is perceived by patients, whether they consider it fitted or not. It also relates mostly to the quality of informed consent for the patients, including the relay of sufficient information to the patients. Majority of the methods applied for this review is the quantitative study, with only one qualitative study meeting the inclusion criteria. In t erms of methodological quality, the cross-sectional studies (Egri, et.al., 2008 Brezis, et.al., 2008 Amir, et.al., 2009 Abalfotouh and Adlan, 2012 Falagas, et.al., 2009 Ghulam, et.al., 2006 Khedhiri, et.al., 2013) p rovided a sufficient insight and trend for a bigger population as opposed to other studies, especially qualitative studies (Habiba, et.al., 2004) which can only provide an insight for a smaller sub-set of a population. In this case, the large group of patients going through different types of surgery are represented in these cross-sectional studies. The cross-sectional studies also allowed for the establishment of a link in the midst of informed consent and outcomes and cognizances of patient surgery (Egri, et.al., 2008 Brezis, et.al., 2008 Amir, et.al., 2009 Abalfotouh and Adlan, 2012 Falagas, et.al., 2009 Ghulam,... In terms of methodological quality, the cross-sectional studies (Egri, et.al., 2008 Brezis, et.al., 2008 Amir, et.al., 2009 Abalfotouh and Adlan, 2012 Falagas, et.al., 2009 Ghulam, et.al., 2006 Khedhiri, et.al., 2013) p rovided a sufficient insight and trend for a big population as opposed to other studies, especially qualitative studies (Habiba, et.al., 2004) which can only provide an insight for a smaller sub-set of a population. In this case, the larger group of patients going through different types of surgery are represented in these cross-sectional studies. The cross-sectional studies also allowed for the establishment of a link in the midst of informed consent and outcomes and perceptions of patient surgery (Egri, et.al., 2008 Brezis, et.al., 2008 Amir, et.al., 2009 Abalfotouh and Adlan, 2012 Falagas, et.al., 2009 Ghulam, et.al., 2006 Khedhiri, et.al., 2013). The sample of individuals from the larger population was polled and given questionnaires of interviews in terms of the quality of informed consent they had from their healthcare givers. Their perception of the informed consent was also gathered through the cross-sect ional studies included in this review. Limitations in cross-sectional studies may however be observed in terms of the direction of the relationship where the quality of the informed consent may contribute to anxiety during surgery or the other way around (Abalfotouh and Adlan, 2012, Khedhiri, et.al., 2013 Ghulam, et.al., 2006). In the prospective studies carried out (Sahin, et.al.)